183 of 923
Overall AIM Rating
What does this mean?
13 of 74
Financials Rating
What does this mean?
Previous Close
Real time prices at ADVFN
INC in the Media
INC on Twitter
Get Rich Slowly: The Unconventional Guide to Mastering Your Money
4 Shares to Buy in 2015
Insetco on ETX Capital
AIM Soiree Top 5 Discussed AIM Shares Widget
your ad here

Insetco discussion on ADVFN


Get up to speed on all the Insetco discussion over on ADVFN's excellent UK investor forums.

Select from 923 AIM Soiree share pages

or check out the AIM Soiree Top 100 Shares by Rank list.

Spread the good Insetco word on social media

or follow AIM Soiree on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Linkedin.

  • Opening Paras on Website by Cwmgwrach
    Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:55:00 GMT

    Insetco specialises in the assimilation of dislocated asset classes which are uniquely structured and distributed via its tailored structured products programme. The objective is to match risk-reward characteristics for institutional investors whilst generating equity returns for its shareholders.

    Its current focus has been the US Life settlements market where exceptional risk-adjusted returns have been observed. Proprietary analysis and use of external consultants across the many embedded risks in the asset class has enabled the company to present a rounded proposition to investors and shareholders alike.

    Bo**ocks! By Cwmgwrach
  • Re: Buying by arborman
    Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:03:00 GMT

    JakNifeInTheBack methinks, nice steady bounce back after the recent boost By arborman
  • Re: Buying by JakNife
    Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:44:00 GMT

    Poor saps, it's a crying shame that they don't understand the economics of the business and thus how they're going to lose a big chunk of that cash. By JakNife
  • Buying by BOWOOD
    Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:47:00 GMT

    Some quite serious buys coming through. By BOWOOD
  • News? by BOWOOD
    Mon, 05 Jan 2015 16:29:00 GMT

    Any one know if there could be something going on here? By BOWOOD
  • 2015 by BOWOOD
    Thu, 01 Jan 2015 14:01:00 GMT

    I think we will see INC attract more speculative trading in the new year but we will need to be smart to sell at the right time and not to be too greedy. By BOWOOD
  • Re: Cheap by JakNife
    Fri, 19 Dec 2014 22:33:00 GMT

    Sadly the company hasn't changed. Those who think that they are "investing" here are actually throwing their money away. I imagine that loads of bucket shop brokers have been calling people up and telling them lies to try to convince them to buy this junk.

    People, if you've been called by a bucket shop broker who's trying to sell this junk to you then please name and shame them here.

    JakNife By JakNife
  • Re: Cheap by BOWOOD
    Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:03:00 GMT

    I think you will find that the company has changed and the way forward will be somewhat brighter. At the current levels I am more than happy to buy in again. I think a couple of thousand invested here will make me more than the same amount in Tesco and will be more exciting. By BOWOOD
  • Re: Cheap by JakNife
    Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:24:00 GMT

    The company has a track record of issuing shares via convertible instruments at ever lower prices in a manner that pass significant benefit to the convertible investors. People buying today are essentially paying a 50% premium to the 0.1p at which convertible holders will be able to buy the shares. The investors in the convertibles have shown a track record of:

    (a) short-selling into the market
    (b) converting and using the shares received to close their short

    Those buying today are paying a 50% premium for shares in a company with no material tangible assets with a business line in a dubious investment class that has previously seen a number of significant financial scams, eg:




    There is no sensible investment case here.


    By JakNife
  • Cheap by BOWOOD
    Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:46:00 GMT

    Having seen INC up to 0.36 and now down to 0.16 I feel the fall has been overdone. The projected earnings from their first deal was not bad, there will be more to come and the M/C of less than £1.5m I feel is on the mean side. By BOWOOD
  • Re: NOW THAT IS WHAT YOU CALL AN RNS!! by eurofil
    Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:18:00 GMT

    yes the rampers have left the building lol.
    By eurofil
  • Re: NOW THAT IS WHAT YOU CALL AN RNS!! by alltold9
    Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:50:00 GMT

    Agree 0.36 was good enough for me! By alltold9
    Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:11:00 GMT

    Have done well here but out today as I feel the M/C cannot be justified and I'd hate to loose such a gain. By BOWOOD
  • Re: NOW THAT IS WHAT YOU CALL AN RNS!! by alltold9
    Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:10:00 GMT

    Look at the value of the RNS compared with the market cap. Says it all!! 0.90p tomorrow? By alltold9
  • Re: NOW THAT IS WHAT YOU CALL AN RNS!! by arborman
    Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:24:00 GMT

    Indeed alltold, could still go crazy from here, or fall back, not a share i follow, care to give me a brief lowdown? By arborman
  • RE: Deadline looms by Millertime
    Sat, 28 Mar 2015 21:27:28 GMT

    Ivan mentioned Q1, the problem is that TW speculated that the timeline would be much shorter and a number of people have managed to read far too much into it. There are a number of people here for a quick buck and may well get bored and leave in the next few weeks but with the increased free float following the recent conversions the effects shouldn't be as extreme as we have seen in the past. Ignore the rampers and derampers who will become deafening as the next few days progress and listen to a number of the reasoned posters such as Notperfect who try to put things into perspective.
  • RE: Deadline looms by Notperfect
    Sat, 28 Mar 2015 18:05:50 GMT

    Ivan's problem is that he set the expectation of Q1 in the TW presentation. In reality he isn't in control of the process as the partners are the people carrying out the due diligence and they'll take as long as they need for such a complex product. If there was anything specifically wrong then INC would have had to put out an RNS by now, and I suspect the two increased holdings RNS wouldn't have happened either. But I agree with you that people will get nervous if nothing positive is released before April. No bad news either might make for an interesting punt later next week.
  • Deadline looms by drjenner
    Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:19:10 GMT

    Quote from Tom Winnifrith 09/02/15: "So where now? We expect the $300,000 to arrive a lot sooner than the “during Q1” Mr Couchman said during the seminar. Having been caught with his trousers down once on this sum we think he is underpromising to over-deliver this time. And we also expect other contracts to follow. On the maths Mr Couchman explained when quizzed by TW at the end of his formal presentation that makes the shares look cheap." With the end of the 1st quarter 2 days away this is now surely a gamble on whether INC receive $ or contracts before the 31st. If not they will have to put out some kind of explanation for the delay, and if they do the SP will tank. I sold out a while back but kept an eye on it. There is really something wrong here IMO, if you don't get an RNS by 31st then huge drop I fear.
  • RE: more sells than buys by sms1982
    Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:53:10 GMT

    Yup, nice 2x 3.5m buys too. Surely it won't be long now before the re-rate occurs...
  • more sells than buys by musiclondon
    Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:57:18 GMT

    The price goes up - we live in interesting times
  • RE: move by RuralPunter
    Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:03:54 GMT

    Indeed. 6.6m volume out of nowhere. Part of me wants to think this is someone in the know building a position before news but in realty it is someone just taking a punt like us and hoping for impending news.
  • move by Troajan
    Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:55:18 GMT

  • RE: Movement by sms1982
    Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:07:48 GMT

    Evening rural I can't explain it from a level two perspective. But it's normally mms trying to cause panic by dropping it off every small sell, a bit like a shake. Only it doesn't work either as everyone is either too stubborn to sell and is waiting for the 300k RNS only and / or has totally switched off from the share in the meantime lol. Either way it had no effect. I guess it was a way to try and create volume, but it failed.
  • Movement by RuralPunter
    Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:43:07 GMT

    That is a massive price change for such a small volume. Can anyone with L2 explain this?
  • RE: Volume .. by Terrafin
    Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:34:51 GMT

    Nice summary Rural - indeed recent buy ins , updated websites etc all seems to point this in one direction ...
  • RE: Volume .. by RuralPunter
    Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:23:35 GMT

    It would be nice to see something. We all know that this is going to pop at some point it is just a matter of when. I am very encouraged by all the recent news and the updated to the company website. We might have a few days here and there were there is slight activity but I think until we have that 300k RNS we are stuck in a holding pattern. There will be some investors who will think that there cash could be better worked elsewhere but I remain confident that this will show a decent return in the very near future.
  • Volume .. by Terrafin
    Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:58:51 GMT

    Would be nice to see some volume today - a bit of ticking up before imminent news .
  • RE: Morning by sms1982
    Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:45:10 GMT

    I certainly hope so Terrafin, it's been a long time in waiting for us PI's who are here now rather than when the glory lands :) lol
  • RE: Morning by Terrafin
    Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:07:09 GMT

    Patience indeed - IMHO the wait will be long forgotten when news comes - we will all be too busy counting up the profits ! Lol
  • RE: Morning by sms1982
    Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:15:25 GMT

    I dunno what's worse, a big sell or zero volume. Nothing's changed other than SH's boredom. It's just a pity there's no timescales so we've no incentive to know when something might happen. Just gotta keep the faith, keep on being patient and wait for the goods to be delivered.