AIM Soiree Butler Polo Resources POL.L

Polo ResourcesPolo Resources Limited (AIM and TSX: POL) is a globally focused natural resources and mine development investment company. We select, acquire and manage substantial investments in companies and projects with strong value enhancement potential and attractive growth prospects, and utilise this ability to deliver value-adding returns.

Polo Resources is trading above the moving 50 day average and above the moving 200 day average on below-average volume.
Visit the Polo Resources website.
Trade UK shares long or short on margin without the noise at Core Spreads.
Follow the trades of top traders with Ayondo.
14 of 900
Overall AIM Rating
What does this mean?
1 of 68
Financials Rating
What does this mean?
8.495p
Previous Close
Real time prices at ADVFN
Ayondo

All 900 AIM Soiree Share Pages


AIM Soiree Top 100 Shares by Rank

Click here for Polo Resources Discussion on ADVFN

ADVFN
  • Blackham Resources by Spight
    Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:06:00 GMT

    News out on ASX.... By Spight
  • jimbo2076 filtered by spotyplonka1
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:34:00 GMT

    for continuing with a negative thread title.

    Barmy....
    Nuts and Berries.
    And a goose in the freezer in every home in Bangladesh tomorrow. By spotyplonka1
  • Re: car crash by jimbo2076
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:07:00 GMT

    Didn't really read most of that post as life is too short. However the definition of tro11 from Wikipedia:

    "In Internet slang, a tro11 (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

    Its you down to a tee! What anger are you talking about when you reference me? I couldn't be happier in life to be fair! By jimbo2076
  • Re: delayed by spotyplonka1
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:04:00 GMT

    SURPRISE, surpise.... By spotyplonka1
  • delayed by searchers-son
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:40:00 GMT

    28-Oct-1411:29:238.25962,346Sell* 8.258.7479.39kO

    some funny trades at that time By searchers-son
  • OG has something missing by spotyplonka1
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:28:00 GMT

    AAAAA spotyplonka1 behind D.
    I don't do men's botty.
    By spotyplonka1
  • Re: car crash by spotyplonka1
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:19:00 GMT

    sp1 behind OG.
    OG = black as coal.

    imo if asked...as I give and take By spotyplonka1
  • Re: car crash by spotyplonka1
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:15:00 GMT

    I degree view = clever clogs, superior and humble, ninja trapper wearing shaun's mankini

    imo. elf elf back to myself...counting words now.

    By spotyplonka1
  • Re: car crash by Orchard Gate
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:59:00 GMT

    Apologies, I ran two posts together. Meant to say:

    Thanks Betamax and you do of course have a point. But here's mine: if someone says "I think this share is likely to prove pretty worthless and best avoided" and others disagree with him/her, then I'd agree with you that while that person is entitled to say "told you so" and have a quick gloat should the share price collapse it is irritating if they pop up every ten minutes and poke the bulls with a stick.

    But - and it's a big but (cue some lame joke about Jimbo’s wife or his head) - if said poster says his piece and those who disagree with him respond with personal abuse - and shout nonsense about there being "NO NEED FOR ANY FURTHER DEBATE", and make laughable statements about the company, the share and our poster’s views thereon, then I think that poster is perfectly entitled to come back from time to time and give some back, wind up the eejits and generally have a bit of a laugh at their expense.

    You'll have noted that the examples which poor old Jimbo (I've just topped up at 37p, Jimbo, hence his anger) gave of my 'trolling' posts were actually all about Polo, whereas almost all of his posts are about anything but, usually being about me. I'm beginning to wonder if he might need to see someone about this weird obsession of his.

    So tell me this: why if I say "Oh look, Polo's down another 10p today, what a gas" is that considered 'trolling' but if Spight gets all excited and starts shouting about “we’re up a penny, here we go here we go” and then puts those little pictures up of smiley faces holding bags of money is that considered a valid and worthwhile contribution to a share discussion board?

    The truth is a lot of the rather weaker minded folk here want only to see positive comments and anything other than that is unwelcome. Given they reacted with abuse from the start they're not in a good position to complain now if I pop back from time to time and wind them up a bit and the more they try to bully me off this board, the more often I'll be back to laugh at their stupidity. By Orchard Gate
  • Re: car crash by Orchard Gate
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:58:00 GMT

    “This is a offensive,abusive slur on the entire Welsh nation” Oh do grow up. Do you really feel offended if people suggest the Irish like a drink, the Scottish are tight fisted, the English uptight and the Welsh attracted to sheep? Really? You need to get out more.

    And where do I see your objections to the anti-Semitic comments made by Jimbo? Or his wish that I be involved in a car crash. Oh no, those were okay were they? As for his comment about having my posts removed, I had to laugh. He had 21 removed in one day. His previous two here have just been removed. In fact, he appears unable to post anything which is not abusive. But you don’t object to any of those do you, so it’s not offensive comments to which you object but rather the person posting.

    I posted a perfectly serious comment on Polo shares which is what this board is meant to be about. If you or your mates here disagree, you’re free to say why, if you’re capable of doing so. If you can’t, try keeping quiet. You might think you can’t bully people off this board because they express views about Polo you don’t like (and by the way, hello, hello in there – I was right to say it was to be avoided, was I not?) but it’s not working so you might as well give it a rest. The more rubbish you and your trolling chums post, the more often I’ll be back to point out what a bag of nails Polo is and how dumb you are to hold it.

    Thanks Betamax and you do of course have a point. But here's mine: if someone says "I think this share is likely to prove pretty worthless and best avoided" and others disagree with him/her, then I'd agree with you that while that person is entitled to say "told you so" and have a quick gloat should the share price collapse it is irritating if they pop up every ten minutes and poke the bulls with a stick.

    But - and it's a big but (cue some lame joke about Jimbo’s wife or his head) - if said poster says his piece and those who disagree with him respond with personal abuse - and shout nonsense about there being "NO NEED FOR ANY FURTHER DEBATE", and make laughable statements about the company, the share and our poster’s views thereon, then I think that poster is perfectly entitled to come back from time to time and give some back, wind up the eejits and generally have a bit of a laugh at their expense.

    You'll have noted that the examples which poor old Jimbo (I've just topped up at 37p, Jimbo, hence his anger) gave of my 'trolling' posts were actually all about Polo, whereas almost all of his posts are about anything but, usually being about me. I'm beginning to wonder if he might need to see someone about this weird obsession of his.

    So tell me this: why if I say "Oh look, Polo's down another 10p today, what a gas" is that considered 'trolling' but if Spight gets all excited and starts shouting about “we’re up a penny, here we go here we go” and then puts those little pictures up of smiley faces holding bags of money is that considered a valid and worthwhile contribution to a share discussion board?

    The truth is a lot of the rather weaker minded folk here want only to see positive comments and anything other than that is unwelcome. Given they reacted with abuse from the start they're not in a good position to complain now if I pop back from time to time and wind them up a bit and the more they try to bully me off this board, the more often I'll be back to laugh at their stupidity.
    By Orchard Gate
  • Re: car crash by jimbo2076
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:50:00 GMT

    "I'm only guessing, but it could be that Orchard Gate never says anything constructive on this BB either these days. It's generally just gloating"

    Bang on first time. Also he loves to give it out but then gets upset when someone tries to give him a taste of his own medicine.

    Look through his posting history and his alleged wifes account Kryptes (although it could be his second account, we are not totally sure). They are two of the nastiest tr0lls I have come across. By jimbo2076
  • Re: car crash by spotyplonka1
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:23:00 GMT

    Betamax man,

    thank you for your summary.

    Orchard Gate's 1 degree perspective on Polo to date is correct. So he is an investor in Aim as far as I can see.

    He can also take a walk, and come back to Polo bb with reasons why Polo is a munta and only worth 2p imo.

    Until such time, if OGs remains the same, his outward persona cold, calculating and HUMBLE and SUPERIOR all mixed into one. IMO.

    This is OGs prerogative.
    Remember my stated position? - I am in charge of virtual Polo bb as i have a 359 degree view on Polo and bb givers and takers from said date. (pls check history).

    Also,I may be behind OG, so I am watching his 'karate', and if he does not reveal his martial prowess. This time onwards I consider OG a sleeper ninja type of person.

    let's strip down to our swimming costumes,
    OG wears the Ali G mankini .next date in a 360 sided cage, or hairy jungle forest any time...

    Shaun of the sheep is at the ringside.

    hippo yawwwwwwns By spotyplonka1
  • Re: car crash by Betamax man
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:42:00 GMT

    jimbo2076 may I ask what your issue is with Orchard Gate?


    I'm only guessing, but it could be that Orchard Gate never says anything constructive on this BB either these days. It's generally just gloating.

    I used to tick up his posts, because often they gave a worthwhile counter view, and I totally agreed that it's healthy on these BB's to have balanced views.

    The fact is, that most of us have now realised that POLO is a dog of a stock, and most of us have probably lost a good deal of cash. We all know that Orchard Gate was right to have spotted this. It just doesn't need gloating about.

    The periodic "Morning all - see I was right, I told you so" type of post.

    Anyway, it's probably not going to stop. Some folks probably have too much time on their hands.

    Good luck all, OG included. We're all just trying to do the best we can and failing where POLO is concerned.

    Cheers. By Betamax man
  • Re: blackham reinstated by alpal
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:22:00 GMT

    Not a great investment so far; down 50% By alpal
  • Re: blackham reinstated by Spight
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:48:00 GMT

    Polo takes placement in Blackham Resources

    Polo Resources (AIM and BSX: POL), the natural resources investment company with interests in oil and gas, gold, coal, iron ore and phoshate, is pleased to announce that it is participating in a Share Placement in ASX listed West Australian gold explorer Blackham Resources Limited ("Blackham") (ASX: BLK), under which the Company will acquire 4,761,905 ordinary shares in Blackham at 21 cents per share for a total consideration of A$1 million, giving it an interest in approximately 4.2 per cent of Blackham's enlarged undiluted issued ordinary share capital.
    By Spight
  • Morning! by NathanBryce
    Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:29:53 GMT

    MORNING ALL!!
  • delayed by fatherjockstrap
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:34:31 GMT

    28-Oct-1411:29:238.25962,346Sell* 8.258.7479.39kO some funny trades at that time
  • RE: Oh well not us then by leonasdad
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:00:41 GMT

    Abstract: Polo = Double concentrate washing up liquid. You still squeeze the same amount as normal concentrate. Use more metered running water to rinse dishes, and pay for the pleasure of doing so. Therefore, to get a squeeky clean finish, means to dilute mahosively to rinse away the bubbles, froth, suds and scum. Try doing that wearing marigolds tapping an iPad. More exploration required today for long term gains- dilution pls. = 2p. Imo.
  • Oh well not us then by Masterbaker
    Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:44:56 GMT

    link

  • RE: holding RNS by ManuDave
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:21:22 GMT

    trademarked by FJP indeed. It has at least encouraged a few buys and the ask now ticked up to 9.15 We'll have pictures of rockets soon....
  • 8.52 on the Bid by CaveatEmptor
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:15:56 GMT

    Strange figure for the bid - movement behind the scenes?
  • RE: holding RNS by fatherjockstrap
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:42:44 GMT

    TM dear boys nice little topppy up
  • RE: holding RNS by Masterbaker
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:28:07 GMT

    er, isn't that copywrite/trademarked by fjs?
  • RE: holding RNS by ManuDave
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:26:41 GMT

    About Nick Greenwood Nick Greenwood commenced his career in private client stock broking during the late 1970s. Nick was a founder member of Christows stockbroking operation in 1991. He joined the Christows Investment Trust team setting up their London office in 1995 and became lead manager in November 1997. Nick joined iimia in July 2002, later becoming Chief Investment Officer following the merger with Exeter Fund Managers in August 2005. A subsequent merger with Miton Asset Management occurred in November 2007. Born in Hoddesen, Hertfordshire, Greenwood is an avid sportsman who enjoys football and national hunt racing.

    link

  • RE: holding RNS by ManuDave
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:19:14 GMT

    Polo's 2nd largest holder (behind Mettiz Capital) can't be bad news. DYORamping - got in in before Mr Strap!
  • RE: holding RNS by ManuDave
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:12:54 GMT

    Nicholas John Greenwood passes 5% going from holding 13.7m to 14.2m
  • holding RNS by ManuDave
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:11:22 GMT

    link

  • RE: If silence is golden by 50glass
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:04:34 GMT

    I don't understand the two stage approach; First a Trading Halt announcement two days ago then announcement of proposed capital raising. It was self-evident that significant capital was needed to progress the project, given the limited resources on Celamin's balance sheet.
  • RE: If silence is golden by CaveatEmptor
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:59:17 GMT

    -Looks like Celamin announcement could be fireworks! But will it be a rocket or a damp squib?LOL
  • RE: If silence is golden by Masterbaker
    Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:47:11 GMT

    2nd page,