By farmerdaveThu, 21 Mar 2013 14:44:00 GMT When I posted before I said 33-67p still think it is in that range but given the pressure on peoples budgets at present wouldnt care to narrow it down really - seeing a slight growth in asset values but will be a while before it feels like we are out of the woods
FD By farmerdave
By alpalThu, 21 Mar 2013 14:32:00 GMT FD: Any view on realisable NAV? Like many, I am horribly under water having been stupid enough to buy when the directors were giving value of 150p and saying 'we are not Southern Cross' By alpal
By farmerdaveThu, 21 Mar 2013 08:28:00 GMT Good to see 25p so quickly - given recent run in most property companies should see this continue closer to NAV
Cheers
FD By farmerdave
By alpalThu, 20 Dec 2012 15:11:00 GMT FD: I don't remember our 'esteemed' directors talking about non-core investments when they bought these. As for the demonstrable incompetence of whoever has been doing the valuations.. but I am sure their remuneration and fees were based on the valuation being high not whether the valuation was realistic.
As for reducing costs: Easily done, fire all the directors and appoint fewer [but passably competent] at lower fees. I am available as a director - I will guarantee that I am more competent than the present lot. By alpal
By farmerdaveThu, 20 Dec 2012 10:46:00 GMT Small diff to the valuation of the company but a lot of overheads and leverage reduced. On the back of this management should take note that costs should be severely reduced
Generally a good thing for company to reduce the trouble over assets that are not really adding anything to the company
FD
By farmerdave
By jaxonsaxSat, 15 Dec 2012 13:36:00 GMT I was disappointed with the announcement.
Given the length of time the strategic review has been ongoing it seemed a fairly small part of the groups activities and one assumes it was the easiest deal for them to do, so a discount to previous valuation of 13% doesnt bode well for the rest of the portfolio given the level of debt magnifies the effect of a valuation shortfall as far as NAV is concerned.
The US looks like a huge problem as the USPS is losing a LOT of money so buyers for that part will be very scarce or at hugely discounted valuations to reflect that.
I can see this drifting back to 10p quite easily. By jaxonsax
By indibayThu, 13 Dec 2012 08:41:00 GMT no reason to strike the directors off my black list then By indibay
By alpalThu, 13 Dec 2012 08:24:00 GMT It seems our directors have finally woken up to the fact that the company has a cash flow problem and we are now into fire-sale mode to correct this.
Properties now sold at way below previous valuations - but I don't see any mention of managers or advisors or valuers being fired for incompetence.
Also note that the current RNS does not include a current NAV; just an indication that the directors haven't a clue.... By alpal
By alpalThu, 08 Nov 2012 09:14:00 GMT Did anyone attend? And hopefully get some useful info on the future [if any] for PSPI? By alpal
By ShipTapTue, 16 Oct 2012 21:34:00 GMT I've heard that the Board plan to give it a miss. By ShipTap
By ValutaTue, 16 Oct 2012 21:14:00 GMT Does anyone plan to attend?
Valuta
~
Public Service Props
Notice of AGM
RNS Number : 8111O
Public Service Properties Inv Ltd
16 October 2012
Notice of Annual General Meeting
Public Service Properties Investments Limited (AIM: PSPI) announces that the Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at 11:00a.m. on Wednesday, 7th November 2012 at 7 Bond Street, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3NP.
The notice of AGM has been posted to shareholders. Electronic copies of the documents can be obtained from the Company's website:
www.pspiltd.com

By Valuta
By SkeptoThu, 04 Oct 2012 14:41:00 GMT It looks to me as if the market is treating the company like all other heavily indebted property funds i.e. a heavy discount. In this case the cash issues (e.g. Switzerland) probably add to the general gloom. By Skepto
By alpalWed, 03 Oct 2012 16:26:00 GMT From the downward price movement today, I sadly fear we are about to find out that the directors are a greater 'wunch of bankers' than we thought and that the NAV is much less than 70p.
What would please me most? Having to apologise to all on this BB for having maligned the directors when they produce a sale of all assets and pay us all 50p per share. By alpal
By alpalWed, 03 Oct 2012 11:16:00 GMT Like you [I assume] I am showing a huge loss on this but also cannot afford to 'average down'. Unfortunately I also have no confidence in the directors ever since I received an e-mail from them a year or two back saying "We are not like Southern Cross". And they still keep their jobs? By alpal
By itsfatboyjimTue, 02 Oct 2012 17:41:00 GMT I hope that there's not more bad news to come, but with the NAV per share at 73.4p at 30 June 2012 (31 December 2011 - 108.3p) it is looking like there is at least some upside, I just can't stomach to invest any more though. By itsfatboyjim
* Charts, price and volume data provided by the mighty
Yahoo Finance may be delayed by up to an hour.
For the love of all things velvet, please always check financial data from more than one source before entering a trade. For live prices scoot on over to
Share Price. If you know what's good for you, you'll check out:
LSE Soirée,
Investor Trader,
DOW follows FTSE and
AIM Shares Compared. Our cocktail of the day is
Gimlet Fizz - a snappy, gin-doused number that'll take out a vital organ given the chance.